Kansas Real Estate Commission
 
  9/6/2010
  Summer 2004
                                        
 
     
 
In This Issue
 
2004 Legislative Session Roundup
   
 
Inflating Purchase Price May Violate Law
   
Current content selection
Avoid BRRETA Troubles
   
 
Complying with BRRETA Fee-for-Service
   
 
Take Caution with Marketing Incentive Programs
   
 
What Happens When Your Supervising Broker Dies?
   
 
Team Operations – What Every Team Member Should Know
   
 
Don't Get Caught Up in Unlicensed Activities
   
 
Ministerial Acts Deserve a Second Look
   
 
Brokerage Relationships in New Home Subdivisions
   
 
Please, No Legal or Advisory Opinion Requests
   
 
Upcoming Renewal Dates
   
 
Checklist For Obtaining a New License By Exam
   
 
Disciplinary Actions
   
 
Best Wishes to Judy Nusser
   
 
Two New Laws Enacted
   
 
KREC Welcomes New Commissioners
   
Avoid BRRETA Troubles

 

Brokerage Relationships Dos and Don'ts

Here are two scenarios, based on actual cases, that are violations of the Brokerage Relationships in Real Estate Transactions Act (BRRETA) and have caused disciplinary actions to be taken against the licensee.

SCENARIO ONE
Floyd Slawson is the supervising broker of Kelsey's Realty. He has four agents working in his firm. Floyd has decided to set policy in his firm to offer only designated agency agreements. One of Floyd's agents, Howard, has provided the brokerage relationships brochure to Helen, a potential buyer. Helen has decided that she would like representation, and on behalf of his Broker, Howard signs her up to a designated buyer's agency agreement, wherein he is named the designated agent.

Floyd has a good friend, Otis, who needs to sell his house. Floyd takes the listing as a designated seller's agent, naming himself as the designated agent. Helen gets a showing of Otis' house, and writes an offer. Another of Floyd's agents, associate broker Bernard, tells Floyd that he will need a signed TBA-DA since an in-house transaction is occurring. The TBA-DA is executed, the contract is executed, and they close.

Upon later examination of the broker's records, what did the auditor find?

A review of the transaction file reflects the supervising broker named himself as a designated agent. K.S.A. 58-30,109(b)(4) reflects that whenever a designated agent is named, the supervising broker becomes a transaction broker by default. It is therefore not possible for the supervising broker to ever take an agency agreement as a designated agent.

Bernard gave Floyd bad advice. A TBA-DA would only be used on an in-house transaction, when the same person has both a designated agency agreement with the seller, and a designated agency agreement with the buyer.
The auditor found a violation of K.A.R. 86-3-27, improper use of a TBA form.

What should Floyd have done to stay in compliance with the BRRETA?
Floyd has several options.

1. He could have refused to allow designated agency in his firm, in which case, he would have taken a seller's agency agreement, and Howard would have taken a buyer's agency agreement with Helen, on behalf of his Broker, Floyd. When Helen wanted to purchase Otis' property, a TBA-RES (Transaction Broker Addendum-Residential) would have been used to step down from the agency relationship to transaction brokerage.

2. He could have allowed his agents to practice designated agency, while he chose to:
A.) Not actively list and/or sell
B.) Take listings as a transaction broker or work with buyers as a
transaction broker.

3. He could have decided that everyone in his firm must practice transaction brokerage.

One of the main things the broker must consider is that although he or she can decide company policy concerning what the firm will offer, the decision is not chiseled in stone. The policy should be flexible to appropriately address different circumstances. Licensees will have to consider every scenario on an individual transaction basis. Licensees should consult with their Broker for help and advice. The broker may want to consider what happens when the firm offers only transaction brokerage, and a licensee in the firm wants to buy or sell through the firm. Or, what happens if a family member or business associate is the buyer or seller? What happens if you decide on practicing agency, and a buyer and seller come to you already having their deal worked out and are seeking only help with the paperwork? If an agency agreement exists, the licensee must perform the functions required of an agent. The broker should also understand the ramifications if he or she practices both agency and designated agency, as opposed to practicing only buyer agency and seller agency or only designated agency.

SCENARIO TWO
Juanita is a new salesperson, working at Blue Bird Realty. The supervising broker of the firm, Frank, has 34 agents working under him, including Juanita. Frank has decided that his firm will only offer transaction brokerage. Sarah is also a new agent. She talks to a seller about listing his house. Sarah, with assistance from Frank, and the seller enter into a written transaction brokerage agreement listing. Juanita is working with a buyer as a transaction broker. Juanita and the buyer entered into a verbal transaction brokerage agreement. The buyer gets a showing of the seller's property, and writes an offer. Juanita is nervous, and, without talking to her broker, Frank, decides it would have been better to have had the buyer signed to a transaction brokerage agreement also. Juanita goes to the file room and grabs a TBA-DA
(Transaction Broker Addendum-Designated Agency) agreement, and has the buyer sign the buyer's portion. The contract is put together, and a closing occurs.

Upon review of the file we see that Juanita used a TBA-DA instead of either using a written transaction brokerage agreement, or just staying with a verbal agreement. This is an example of improper use of a TBA form – a violation of K.A.R. 86-3-27.